Lock Upp 2 Winner Shreya Kalra: Shreya Kalra has finally addressed the criticism surrounding her Lock Upp 2 victory. After facing allegations that the reality show was biased in her favour, the winner questioned why viewers only raised concerns after she lifted the trophy.
While Shreya’s fans celebrated her victory, a section of viewers argued that she did not deserve to win and alleged that the show’s outcome was influenced. Responding to the backlash, Shreya pointed towards several twists and advantages that were introduced throughout the season.
Shreya Kalra Responds To ‘Biased’ Lock Upp 2 Allegations
During an Instagram Ask Me Anything session, a fan directly questioned Shreya about the criticism surrounding her victory.
“People are saying you didn’t deserve it. It was biased,” the fan asked.
Shreya did not hold back in her response.
“You tell me if not me then who?” she said, before questioning why similar accusations were not made when other contestants received second chances or benefited from twists during the season.
She continued by pointing to contestants being brought back, secret-room twists and an advantage that she claimed was taken away from her and given to another contestant.
“Why didn’t people call the show biased when contestants were brought back? Why didn’t they call the show biased when they were kept in the secret room?” Shreya asked.
She further added, “Why didn’t they say it was biased when an advantage was taken away from me and given to someone else? Why didn’t they say it then?”
Ending her response on a confident note, Shreya said, “Mic drop ho chuka hai guys.”
Why Was Lock Upp 2 Called Biased?
The controversy surrounding Lock Upp 2 was not limited to Shreya’s victory.
The season featured multiple twists that allowed previously eliminated contestants to return to the competition, leading to discussions among viewers about the show’s format and fairness.
Akanksha Choudhary, for example, was sent to a secret room after being eliminated through the inmates’ vote. She later returned to the main competition.
Yogesh Rawat and Harshad Chopda were also brought back as wildcards approximately two weeks before the finale after previously exiting the show.
These twists gave contestants additional opportunities to remain in the competition and potentially reach the finale.
Shreya used these developments to question why allegations of bias were not raised with the same intensity when other contestants benefited from similar twists.
Shreya Kalra Also Received A Major Advantage
Shreya also acknowledged the advantage she received during a semi-final task.
The task gave her the power to decide which contestant would be eliminated immediately. She chose Shivangi Joshi.
However, the situation took an unexpected turn when Harshad Chopda, who had become the first finalist, decided to give up his finalist position to save Shivangi.
Harshad’s decision allowed Shivangi to continue in the competition, while he was subsequently eliminated.
The incident became another example of how the show’s twists and decisions could dramatically alter the competition.
Farah Khan Also Responds To Allegations Of Favouritism
Shreya was not the only person associated with Lock Upp 2 to face accusations of favouritism.
Host Farah Khan was also targeted by viewers who alleged that she was biased towards Shreya during the season.
Farah recently addressed the criticism in her vlog while visiting Shreya at her home.
According to Farah, she only became aware of the allegations after viewers began commenting that she was favouring Shreya.
She explained that the criticism was partly connected to a professional association involving their respective teams.
Farah said that Shreya’s YouTube company and her own company were managed by the same team, Qyuki, which works with numerous content creators.
She recalled asking the team whether Shreya was associated with them and said she did not know about the connection beforehand.
“If Shreya is under them, and they said yes. But I didn’t know, so how was I biased?” Farah questioned.
Shreya Kalra’s Lock Upp 2 Victory Continues To Spark Debate
Reality-show finales often generate intense reactions because viewers become heavily invested in contestants and their journeys.
In Shreya’s case, her victory has led to both celebration and criticism.
While her supporters believe she earned the trophy through her performance during the season, critics continue to question whether the show’s twists and decisions influenced the final outcome.
Shreya’s latest response makes it clear that she does not agree with those allegations.
Instead, she believes the criticism should be viewed in the context of the entire season rather than being focused solely on the finale.
FAQs
Who won Lock Upp 2?
Shreya Kalra won Lock Upp 2.
Why are viewers calling Lock Upp 2 biased?
Some viewers questioned the show’s fairness after Shreya Kalra’s victory and pointed to various twists, contestant returns and advantages during the season.
What did Shreya Kalra say about the bias allegations?
Shreya questioned why viewers did not call the show biased when other contestants were brought back, placed in a secret room or benefited from other twists.
Did Shreya Kalra receive an advantage on Lock Upp 2?
Yes. During a semi-final task, Shreya received the power to decide which contestant would be eliminated immediately.
What did Farah Khan say about being biased towards Shreya Kalra?
Farah Khan denied knowingly favouring Shreya and explained that she was unaware of a professional connection between Shreya and the team managing her YouTube company.
